Mikail Alimli vs Cedric Stanke Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Alimli vs C. Stanke

Mikail Alimli
FRA
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
27
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Cedric Stanke
GER
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
27
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Alimli 1 - 0 Stanke
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mikail Alimli winning 2 and Cedric Stanke winning 0. The last match between Mikail Alimli and Cedric Stanke was at the M15 Amstelveen, 02-07-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Mikail Alimli getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alimli | 1 |
| Stanke | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Amstelveen(07-02-24)
Mikail Alimli
6
6
Cedric Stanke
3
3
M. Alimli vs C. Stanke H2H Profile
M. Alimli vs C. Stanke Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mikail Alimli has won 39.38% of points on their second serve, while Cedric Stanke has won 39.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mikail Alimli, in recent form, has won 45.05% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cedric Stanke has won 45.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.01% and 27.23% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mikail Alimli has saved 44.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cedric Stanke has saved 62.90% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mikail Alimli has won 43.59% of matches played (W/L 17/22), with Cedric Stanke winning 54.55% (W/L 24/20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mikail Alimli has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 17/16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 36/50). Cedric Stanke has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 53/40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 44/58).
- Player level: In the last year, Mikail Alimli has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.74% of matches (W/L 17/21), where as Cedric Stanke has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 24/20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mikail Alimli winning 1 times and Cedric Stanke being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mikail Alimli winning 2 and Cedric Stanke winning 0.
- The last match between Mikail Alimli and Cedric Stanke was at the M15 Amstelveen, 02-07-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Mikail Alimli getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mikail Alimli has played against opponents with an average rank of 232.92 while Cedric Stanke has played against players with an average rank of 43.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mikail Alimli has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cedric Stanke has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mikail Alimli has converted 34.00% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cedric Stanke has converted 39.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mikail Alimli vs Cedric Stanke Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Alimli vs C. Stanke H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:16:0 | Average Match Time | 1:16:0 |
| 63% (35/56) | 1st Serve % | 61% (30/49) |
| 69% (24/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (20/30) |
| 57% (12/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 45% (22/49) | Return Points Win % | 36% (20/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Alimli 49%, Stanke 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Alimli 50%, Stanke 49%.
Break Points Saved %: Alimli 54%, Stanke 69%.
M. Alimli Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
C. Stanke Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Q2 | L | 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||

M. Alimli vs C. Stanke Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47.26% (95/106) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.49% (98/100) |
| 46.88% (210/238) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.44% (219/224) |
| 49.11% (2093/2169) | Games Win/Loss | 49.72% (2192/2217) |
| 52.24% (35/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.99% (53/40) |
| 41.86% (36/50) | Clay Win/Loss | 43.14% (44/58) |
| 50.00% (24/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 469 | Aces Total | 239 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 341 | Total Double Faults | 208 |
| 1:2:36 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 262.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 153.38 |
| 55% (4532/8288) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3088/4930) |
| 68% (3088/4532) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2025/3088) |
| 48% (1790/3755) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (856/1842) |
| 42% (318/751) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (179/409) |
| 38% (3114/8089) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1862/4851) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.96% (94/102) | Futures W/L | 49.49% (98/100) |
| 47% (92/197) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (97/197) |
| 47% (20/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (17/35) |
| 54% (27/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (24/48) |
| 85% (88/75) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (101/88) |
| 15% (88/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (101/13) |
| 18% (113/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (97/10) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction08:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction06:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction08:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
PredictionPotential H2H Matches This Week
Alimli (M25 Luanda)
Alimli vs NagelCould play in The Quarterfinals
Alimli vs GarciaCould play in The Quarterfinals
Alimli vs BojarskiCould play in The Quarterfinals
Alimli vs SchifrisCould play in The Quarterfinals
Matundo vs AlimliCould play in The Second
Strombachs vs AlimliCould play in The Second
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
01:50
H2H 0-0
03:05
H2H 0-0
03:05
H2H 0-0
03:30
H2H 0-0
04:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal